Ç.A., who teaches at Şarköy Anatolian High School, sent messages to his ENT student on his mobile phone. Disturbed by the messages, the ENT explained the situation to his family. The family also complained about the teacher. A judicial investigation has also been opened against the teacher who was suspended by the district governor’s office. Ç.A., whose statement was taken at the prosecutor’s office, was arrested on 9 February by the criminal justice of the peace of Şarköy, where he was taken.
General Prosecutor’s Office of Sarkoy, teacher C.A. After completing the investigation against him, the indictment he prepared was accepted by the Criminal Court of First Instance in Şarköy. It was requested that teacher C.A. be sentenced to 1 to 6 years in prison for “qualified sexual harassment against the child”.
“I’M SHOCKED”
In the indictment, which stated that the crime was committed by “relationship of education and teaching” and “communication”, the student E.NT testified that the teacher had not hadn’t attended his classes for a year, and that he had taken his school friend’s phone number and sent him videos and messages. ENT said: “I was very surprised when I saw him at first, what he wrote was so ridiculous to me and I was offended. Nobody can talk to me like that, I don’t even talk not to my relatives like that. When my dad came home late, I immediately told him and my dad kept texting me even though he told the teacher. “There was no harassment against me at school before, but I was uncomfortable with their appearance. because I was afraid and hesitant because of these events. I am a plaintiff and a complaint against him,” he said.
‘BABY, Girl, Peanut, Kiss’
In the indictment, other students whose statements were taken were also included in the statement that their teacher C.A. used expressions such as “my baby, “my daughter”, peanut”, I kissed them. CA teacher In his deposition, he claims that his student ENT took another student’s phone to allow him to attend literature lessons at school and that is why he contacted him. THAT. said he threw the song to his student in order to examine it in a literary sense, and said:
“Since the effect of alcohol has been talked about, the subject has collapsed and come to this point. After ENT, I was going to contact 5-6 people whose names I did not know at because of the course. You asked me ‘my baby’, ‘girl’, ‘pistachio’, ‘I kissed myself.’ The approach to the students is different. As a sincere teacher, I teach my classes in this way and this is how I approach the students. Again, in the content of the correspondence you asked me “Do you want to live without telling anyone? Because I saw the students in the group, including the ENT, feel uncomfortable with the correspondence, “write it down anyway or like you want”, I told him to give his all. I do not accept the accusations against me, I did not sexually abuse ENT in any way. I admit my mistake, but I did not commit the crime.”
In the indictment, the correspondence of Professor Ç.A. after he threw the song ‘Hold a song’ to his student ENT was as follows:
THAT. : Listen baby, maybe you can throw it to your loved one.
ENT: Thank you, sir.
THAT. : If you have any comments on the song, do not hesitate.
ENT: Ok sir (smiling emoji)
THAT. : Well, even if I never believe you, I’m still waiting.
ORL: I don’t understand, sir.
THAT. : You don’t understand, I understand, don’t worry, good night baby
ENT: Good night, sir.
THAT. : I’m just going to ask one thing. You didn’t understand anything?
ORL: I don’t understand, sir. What was I supposed to understand?
THAT. : Okay, baby, go to sleep. Good evening. Sometimes people like it and you should stay too
ET: (Sometimes sending a message to the part that loves humans) Sir, I don’t understand at the moment
THAT. : Whatever, good night baby, you want to live without telling anyone? Either like this or like that. Write if you want.
“CORRESPONDENCE IS OF THE IMPORTANCE OF HARASSMENT”
In the indictment, it is stated that the teacher insisted in his correspondence at 00:58, “write if you will write in private, but never in public”. It was understood that when the complainant is uncomfortable with these correspondences and understands that he is reacting, he tries to pressure him not to tell anyone, that the correspondence is of the dimension of harassment and that he commits these acts with a sexual motive. that he committed the crime of sexual harassment against her.
