The sanction requested for the famous footballer Sezer Öztürk has become clear

In the opinion of the prosecution, while the sentence requested for the famous footballer was clear, the defendant Öztürk said that he did not want to talk.

On September 19, 2021 in Sancaktepe, while Halil İbrahim S. (24) was going to the barbecue with his father, brother and friends, there was an argument between former Fenerbahce footballer Sezer Öztürk and his friends, who came to the scene. Sezer Öztürk, who opened fire from his luxury car as the argument broke out, left the scene and as a result of the fight Halil İbrahim S. lost his life and 4 people were injured.

Following the arrest warrant for Sezer Öztürk, who disappeared after the incident, the fugitive footballer was caught and arrested as he was about to leave abroad in the back of a van in Artvin Hopa. A complaint has been filed against the famous footballer, demanding a prison sentence of 37 years and 5 months.

“MY CHILD COUNTS UNDER THE BLANKET”

According to news from Seda Nur Günaydın of Sabah, while the detained defendants Sezer Öztürk and Ömer Genç were connected to the hearing at the 1st High Criminal Court of Anatolia in Istanbul via the SEGBİS system, the lawyers for the plaintiffs and the parties were present in the courtroom. During the hearing, the wife of the late Halil İbrahim S., Bahar S., said that she complained all the way and said, “The real victim is me and my child. If those people hadn’t met my wife that day, they would have come home and killed us. My child is delirious at night under the covers. Plaintiff’s attorney Bahar S. also said the defendants acted with the intent to kill the victim and demanded that they be punished.

THE PROSECUTOR DELIVERS THE OPINION

According to the prosecutor’s opinion given at the hearing, on the day of the incident, the victim stopped his vehicle and gave directions when asked for the address, Sezer Öztürk, who was coming with his vehicle, and the victim argued about giving way, then the accused Ömer Genç opened fire in the air, then injured the victims with a knife, then Sezer Öztürk threw the wheel wrench at the truck, and the plaintiff Metin A. was injured because of this, then the defendants Sezer Öztürk and Ömer Genç, who went to their house, met the other party when they left the house again and Sezer Öztürk opened the fire aiming at the target from the back of the transferred victim.

THE ACQUISITION OF SOME OF THEIR SHARES HAS BEEN REQUESTED

In the notice, defendant Ömer Genç was acquitted due to lack of evidence regarding his action against Duran G., and defendant Sezer Öztürk was tried for the crime of “damage to property” against Metin A. It was requested that the defendants Sezer Öztürk and Ömer Genç be acquitted of the crime of “threatened with a firearm”, and that they be punished for various crimes.

THE FAMOUS FURBOLLER HAS BEEN IN DEMAND FOR 24 YEARS

At the same time, in the notice, it was requested that the detained defendant Sezer Öztürk be sentenced to a total of 13 years, 5 months to 23 years and 9 months in prison for the crimes of “deliberate murder under unjust provocation “, “intentional injury with a weapon that will leave a mark under unjust provocation”, “violation of law number 6136”. .

THE OTHER ASKS 14 YEARS IN JAIL

Detained defendant Ömer Genç is expected to be sentenced to 14 years, 6 months to 27 years in total for the crimes of “Deliberate Murder under Unjust Provocation”, “Attack on General Security”, “Deliberate Injury with a Firearm and “Violation of Law No. 6136”. On the other hand, it was requested that the pending suspect Duran Genç be sentenced to 6 months to 1 year 6 months in prison for the crime of “intentional injury with a firearm” due to his action against Sezer Öztürk.

DON’T WANT TO DEFEND

Defendant Sezer Öztürk, who defended himself against the notice, said he would meet his lawyer and present his defense and said: “I repeat my statements. I don’t want to say anything in response to the notice of the prosecutor. If there will be a verdict hearing, I would like to come to court. I was in contact with SEGBİS because I was uncomfortable. The lawyer of the famous football player, on the other hand, has demanded his client’s release, saying they disagreed with the advice, made no effort to hide the evidence, were keeping silent out of respect, and that the incident remained within the limits of self-defense.

ARRESTED STATES WILL CONTINUE

At the end of the hearing, the court decided to reject the requests for the release of the detained defendants Sezer Öztürk and Ömer Genç separately and adjourned the case, deciding that their detention should continue and that the defendant’s lawyers had to have time to defend themselves against public opinion.

Leave a Comment